Not to hijack this thread but a buddy of mine that produces ammunition implies the Federal 210M primer. Why, I do not know as he was making an attempt not to offer me proprietary data. I will utilize the Lee Hand Priming Resource when I get about to utilizing the Feds. Ken, the box is baaaaad.Now what I observed immediately is this stuff seat like
Given that I used to be 3 grains under max load I felt safe adequate not to operate up. There was also a post by German Salazar that showed photographs of primers in motion, showing the WINLR to get hotter than the F210. That gave me some self-confidence in my testing.CCI 250 – Whilst not marketed as part of CCI’s “benchrest” collection, n
Incorporate to quotation Only show this person #five · Jan four, 2011 What Gunhacker explained is genuine. Commonly switching primer brand names is alright, but some primers are hotter which may be a concern In case your load is in the vicinity of utmost. Once the reloading materials were being scarce couple of yrs back I used to be working up a l
Or, take it to your gunsmith for repair. You didn't say no matter if it misfired on manufacturing facility ammo or handloads. If It is handloads, which is a whole other match.Include to quote Only clearly show this user #eleven · Jun twenty, 2010 (Edited) I'd personally choose both. I prefered CCI back every time they have been within the smaller
I always cross reference masses concerning at least two reloading manuals. I exploit Net resources for common info only. I back off at the least ten% from max when there is a element substitution.A practical graph offered in the above mentioned referenced article is the relationship in between peak blast pressures and primer total mass.This is cert